← Search

Annika Andrews

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 73W–49L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Annika Andrews to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-09-12 · GTC-Clarke-StayingAlive · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Angelone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with David Sandwith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Raj Rajasekar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
L
2026-08-11 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Axel Andrews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jenn Gile mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6
W
2026-08-01 · NWW-BC-D'Souza · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jared Oren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · The Warm-Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Lindsey Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Houman Farokhzad championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 60.3% of games
3.0
65.4%
34W–18L · 56.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 43.7% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.6% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
11%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova