← Search

Amadee Pepper

Colorado Springs, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 42W–48L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amadee Pepper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-13 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Limmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-08-11 · CSCC PEPPER · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carol Pepper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · CSCC PEPPER · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Rhodes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Limmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olav Saboe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Limmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Pepper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Pepper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-07 · CSCC PEPPER · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Pepper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Limmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Pepper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Limmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 51.1% of games
5.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
53.1%
17W–15L · 47.8% of games
6.5mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 38.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova