← Search

Rachel Hayes

— year-end
26 matches · 10W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rachel Hayes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-08-31 · FTA18C/Riverside/Pompey · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Dailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · FTA18C/Riverside/Pompey · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · UPTA18M/Kerins/Riverside · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Kerins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · UPTA18M/Kerins/Riverside · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Kerins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · UPTA18M/Kerins/Riverside · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackson Dame mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · UPTA18M/Kerins/Riverside · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raju Gavurla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
Bonnie Haer / Brett Baker
2026-05-17 · UPTA18M/Kerins/Riverside · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackson Dame mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
Annie Reed / Corey Reed
2026-05-10 · UPTA18M/Kerins/Riverside · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Kerins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · FTA18A/Riverside/Sheehan · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Proctor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · FTA18A/Riverside/Sheehan · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsay Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · FTA18A/Riverside/Sheehan · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Busold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · FTA18A/Riverside/Pompey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xiaoqing Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
25%
3W–9L · 39.4% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games
3.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer