← Search

Megan Fellman

— year-end
50 matches · 35W–15L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Megan Fellman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Starnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsey Starnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Carothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-14 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · Sumesh Chopra/Jeff Kennedy X8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Teams47 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
80.6%
29W–7L · 61.3% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova