← Search

Annie Pilz

Raleigh, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 16W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Annie Pilz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-09-03 · MD.Bostic · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Marten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
L
2026-08-26 · MD.Moncrief · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rochelle Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-20 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melissa Keener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · MD.Moncrief · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lannie Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-22 · MD.Ligay · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Crumpler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-01 · MD.Ligay · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-18 · MD.Ligay · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · with Nikki Thigpen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · MD.Frohock · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Cork
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · MD.Pilz · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Ashley Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-10 · MD.Pilz · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laurie Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-18 · MD.Frohock · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 45.8% of games
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
25%
4W–12L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova