← Search

Amanda Sawit

FREMONT, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 7W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amanda Sawit to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2026-06-11 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gnaumie-Monique Valle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maya Morrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-2
W
2026-05-30 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trisha Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Luz Ernest / Erin Smith
2026-05-24 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with JUDY TRAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Mattox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-04 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophie Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-14 · STONEBRAE CC 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maya Morrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Ong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Powers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Chan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 50.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#1 Singles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer