← Search

Ali JACKSON

Dallas, TX
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 12W–29L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Ali JACKSON to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
Kelsey Blackwell / Jennifer Baker
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Leet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Julie Meyer
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Batra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Way
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Stokley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-27 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Toussaint
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Leet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 73.4% of games
3.0
24.3%
9W–28L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal