← Search

ISABEL FRAZIER

Santa Maria, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 5W–8L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add ISABEL FRAZIER to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
W
2025-12-20 · CC SMCC Meals 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-26 · CC SMCC 4.0/3.5/3.0W · #1 Doubles · with Jen Haskell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-14 · CC SMCC 4.0/3.5/3.0W · #1 Doubles · with Cassie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-08-24 · LLW - CC SMCC Cabiles 7.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phong Thach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-06-08 · CC SMCC Meals 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Audrey Weil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-03-29 · CC SMCC Meals 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-02-23 · CC SMCC Meals 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Edry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-02-22 · CC Seeds Mixed 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Minnoch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-15 · LLW - CC SMCC Cabiles Mixed 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Reinwald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-11-02 · CC SMCC Meals 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-3
L
2024-10-27 · CC SMCC Meals 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-10-20 · CC Cabiles SMCC Low-Tri 8.0-6.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alejandro Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 48% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
46%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams