← Search

Jane Erbe

Stamford, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 17W–29L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jane Erbe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-03 · CP:Mixed 55 Team · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gordon Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-25 · CP:Mixed 55 Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gordon Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-18 · CP:Mixed 55 Team · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gordon Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-02-01 · CP:You Got Served:Kaplan · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-24 · CP:You Got Served:Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asha Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-04 · CP:You've Got Served:Kaplan · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-11-22 · CP:You've Got Served:Kaplan · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-06 · NEW:You Got Served:Kaplan · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-06-28 · NEW:You Got Served:Kaplan · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Fran Pennella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
L
2025-06-22 · New: You Got Served:Kaplan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Otis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-13 · New: You Got Served:Kaplan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aisa Aiyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-02-13 · CP:Double Trouble:Fine · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Bass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.7% of games
3.0
0%
0W–22L · 24.8% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert