← Search

Rebekah Carroll

— year-end
52 matches · 31W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rebekah Carroll to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
Meredith Smith / Lauren Tanner
2026-08-25 · Kingman/Hogue/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Riebeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · Kumar/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Stovall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Kumar/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Protz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · Kingman/Hogue/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Riebeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Kumar/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Protz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · Carroll/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christian Barnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
Justin Holy / Brianna Hardy
2026-06-13 · Carroll/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Jorgensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-11-17 · Stephens/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisa Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · Stephens/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-11 · Stephens/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maret Caamano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-05 · Stephens/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Pauley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-20 · Stephens/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 71.9% of games
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.3% of games
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 45% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.5% of games
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams