← Search

Jay Gibson

Dallas, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 8W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jay Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-06-27 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Youngberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Youngberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-20 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Newberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-11 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-06 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-15 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Daitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-05-18 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-11 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-27 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-04-13 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Thresher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-04-06 · JCC/Hauser M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#1 Singles
14%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams