← Search

Amy Lapp

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 51W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amy Lapp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-09-08 · full swing* · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lars Isaacs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
Blake Roemer / Emily Smith
2026-08-19 · full swing* · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lars Isaacs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-18 · full swing* · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lars Isaacs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Middle Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Emily Smith / Karen Hartman
2026-07-23 · Middle Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Annie Thomas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Tapanila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Tapanila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Lori Tapanila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Middle Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Middle Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Middle Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
7W–7L · 48.8% of games
3.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 49.5% of games
5.5mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.4% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.9% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams