← Search

Emily McClenny

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 43W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emily McClenny to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-09-10 · SCC Serve & Slay - Gray · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-09 · SCC Slice Girls - Weisiger · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-05 · SCC Hyatt/Weisiger 7.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laney Hyatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · SCC Serve & Slay - Gray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-01 · SCC Coon · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-22 · SCC Hyatt/Weisiger 7.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laney Hyatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-19 · SCC Serve & Slay - Gray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-19 · SCC Slice Girls - Weisiger · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-18 · SCC Coon · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · SCC Serve & Slay - Gray · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Schuster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-12 · SCC Slice Girls - Weisiger · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · SCC Hyatt/Weisiger 7.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Shrestha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 72.8% of games
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 59.2% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 70.2% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 58.9% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 60.8% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.1% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 68.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Singles
17%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova