← Search

Brittany Hamel

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 66W–24L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Brittany Hamel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Hit Squad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Noemi Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · Volley Partons 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Mossing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Hit Squad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Dohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Volley Partons 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Mossing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · Love Em and Leave Em · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Mossing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Tough Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Tough Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Asbra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Love Em and Leave Em · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · Tough Love · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-06 · Tough Love · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-2
L
2026-04-15 · Tough Love · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Silvana Woodrome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 71.8% of games
3.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 62.5% of games
3.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 60.6% of games
4.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 54.8% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#1 Singles
17%
15 matches
#2 Singles
16%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King