← Search

Loring Woodriff

Charlottesville, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 72W–64L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Loring Woodriff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-08-31 · FCC - Khodirev Ladies 3.0 Singles · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · FCC - Khodirev Ladies 3.0 Singles · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · FCC - Khodirev - 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Lord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · FCC - Khodirev - 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Hay Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · FCC - Khodirev - 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Hay Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · FCC - Khodirev - 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Hay Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · FCC - Khodirev - 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · FCC - Khodirev - 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Hay Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-10 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachael Craven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-18 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Holzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 58.7% of games
3.0
38.9%
21W–33L · 47.9% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.2% of games
5.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 67.7% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
58 matches
#1 Singles
24%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer