← Search

Tani Gelber

— year-end
54 matches · 24W–30L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Tani Gelber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Club Fit SWAT Girls 3.0 Fall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Laitin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anu Pillai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · CRRC Day League - 18+ 3.0 Day · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · CRRC: Highly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Gelber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-13 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare Double · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anu Pillai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-02-28 · CRRC: Highly Strung · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Gelber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-11 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare Double · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Venuti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-27 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare Double · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Venuti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-6
W
2026-01-23 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare Double · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Zolkind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-05 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare Double · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Venuti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
W
2025-12-03 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-24 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Aiken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
44.9%
22W–27L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
24 matches
#1 Singles
26%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova