← Search

Chamonix Mejia

Lubbock, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 10W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Chamonix Mejia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Mejia · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · Mejia · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shannon Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
Kate King / Cody Boggs
2026-08-31 · Mejia · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-17 · Mejia · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Thoms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-26 · Copeland/Childress · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jw McPherson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · Copeland/Childress · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Copeland/Childress · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · Jenkins/Simpson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlen Sturdivant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · Meja · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-13 · Meja · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-11 · Meja · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-28 · Jenkins/Simpson · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 38.5% of games
3.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 31.8% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.4% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#2 Singles
20%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal