← Search

Lauren Hanzlik

CENTENNIAL, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 101W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lauren Hanzlik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-09-01 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madeline Luttrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Thornock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cadkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Thornock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · SS-LGT NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Steve Zubowicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Steve Zubowicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kate Allison / Samuel Swift
2026-06-21 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ian Lane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ian Lane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Yonker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Yonker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2025-09-02 · GAC NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-24 · LTC-M RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ron Funderburke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 57.9% of games
3.5
95.8%
23W–1L · 73% of games
4.0
90%
9W–1L · 63.8% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.4% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 75.4% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 63.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Female Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams