← Search

Sarah Adams

— year-end
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Sarah Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-08-21 · HCC - Connelly · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-12 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-17 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-17 · Hoover CC - Adams/Watts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katelyn Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · HCC - Minor/Ellerman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dane Hoven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-08 · HCC - Minor/Ellerman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dane Hoven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-13 · Hoover CC - Adams/Watts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Tessin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-07 · BH - Adams/Ellerman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Minor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-16 · BH - Adams/Ellerman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monicka Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-09 · BH - Adams/Ellerman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monicka Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-14 · HCC - Adams/Minor · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Chambliss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams28 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 46.4% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova