← Search

Janet Brailsford

Fairburn, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 3W–18L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Janet Brailsford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
Virginia Cheek / Caroline Garcia
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tatiana Mosbey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-2
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-07-13 · USTA Atlanta/Jamie Miles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrienne McKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-15 · USTA Atlanta/Jamie Miles · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Kara Dujenski / Dannie King
2024-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Marie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine McCalla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-6
L
Lindsay Shiffman / Catie Simpson
2024-11-23 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Marie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Marie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine McCalla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-5
L
2024-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Marie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Melissa Malcolm / Linda Wilkinson
2024-01-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine McCalla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Marie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.4% of games
3.5
5.9%
1W–16L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
5 matches
#1 Singles
10%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match
#2 Singles
5%
1 match
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer