← Search

Meghan Scott

— year-end
46 matches · 26W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Meghan Scott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-08-31 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alyssa Ishmael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Evins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Destiny McGee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karysta Sturges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Patterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Jessica Kelly / Chloe McFarlane
2026-06-24 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Autumn Eastep
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brett Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brett Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-22 · McGee/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Destiny McGee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 84.5% of games
3.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 61.2% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 34% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 39.3% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova