← Search

Gale Johnson

Sugar Land, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 41W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Gale Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-05-26 · JCC - Networkers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Faleski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · Missouri City - Ritas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-14 · Missouri City - Ritas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-31 · Missouri City - Ritas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-24 · Missouri City - Ritas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Pamela Sanders / Laura Weaver
2026-03-20 · LLTC - Court Queens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · Missouri City - Vintage Wines · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-17 · JCC - Networkers · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dixie Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-12 · Missouri City - Vintage Wines · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-03 · JCC - Networkers · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dixie Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-26 · Missouri City - Vintage Wines · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Scheller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-24 · Missouri City - Ritas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
52.2%
36W–33L · 52.1% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.7% of games
7.0
25%
3W–9L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#2 Singles
11%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams