← Search

Meghan Hale

— year-end
46 matches · 25W–21L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Meghan Hale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-09 · HCC Rudolph · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Rudolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brooke Goodloe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Corrine Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-20 · HCC Coates · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Lovern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Corrine Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · HCC Rudolph · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda OConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · HCC Coates · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · HCC Sampson Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Brant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · HCC Sampson Squad · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Pamela Blackburn / Erika Anderson
2026-05-02 · HCC Sampson Squad · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corrine Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · HCC Sampson Squad · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · HCC Sampson Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Brant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.8% of games
3.0
40%
6W–9L · 47% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.4% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
15%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#3 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer