← Search

Sassy Martinez

Hillsborough, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 79W–40L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Sassy Martinez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Tough Love · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arelis Avila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · Tough Love · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dasom Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dasom Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · #4 Doubles · 0.0 · with Arelis Avila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Hannah Hironaka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Hannah Hironaka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dasom Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · Queens of the Court · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-4
L
2026-06-25 · Queens of the Court · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karolina Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · Net Divas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Hironaka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · Queens of the Court · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.1% of games
2.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 66.1% of games
3.0
70.5%
31W–13L · 55.6% of games
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 71.6% of games
6.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#1 Singles
15%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer