← Search

Paul Flood

— year-end
93 matches · 50W–43L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Paul Flood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Vanderploeg 7.5 40+ Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Neil Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Greg Trammell / Brett Williams
2026-09-08 · Flood 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Justin Pyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · Vanderploeg 7.5 40+ Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Worley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-20 · Flood 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Burton Jeff Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · Vanderploeg 7.5 40+ Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brent Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · Vanderploeg 7.5 40+ Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Newell Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Flood 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · Haliczer 8.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anton Visser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · Brackett 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Flood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Emily Smith / William Snyder
2026-07-13 · Brackett 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Brackett 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Picaro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · Brackett 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Teams40 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 55.2% of games
4.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 48.5% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.5% of games
7.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 54.6% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.6% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal