← Search

Amanda Urian

Shreveport, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 37W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amanda Urian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Thiels/18/6.5/CWN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachael Deere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-31 · Swanson/18/5.5/CWN/BTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Swanson/18/5.5/CWN/BTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · Coats/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig McCloud mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Coats/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Coats/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig McCloud mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · Coats/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sid Haley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · Coats/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig McCloud mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-09 · Coats/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig McCloud mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-08 · Floyd-Thiels/18/3.0/WN/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dede Plette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-01 · Floyd-Thiels/18/3.0/WN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dede Plette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-31 · May/18/3.5/WN/SHTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
15W–15L · 57.6% of games
3.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.7% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
5.5
80%
8W–2L · 61.2% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.8% of games
3.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer