← Search

Lisa Schwartz

— year-end
53 matches · 35W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lisa Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-06-29 · Net Worthy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trish McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · Net Worthy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · Net Worthy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Grasmeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Net Worthy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · Queens Court · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · SRYMCA 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Hockenos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · SRYMCA 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Hockenos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-07-21 · Northern: Queens' Court · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Imelda Kyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Susan Thomas / HARITHA CHALLAPALLI
2025-06-23 · Northern: Queens' Court · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcy Duval
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-14 · Northern: Queens' Court · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Imelda Kyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-02 · Northern: Queens' Court · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Grasmeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-05-27 · Queens' Court · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 66.8% of games
3.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 55.2% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
19 matches
#1 Singles
34%
18 matches
#2 Singles
13%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova