← Search

Greg Spick

Marietta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 19W–24L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Greg Spick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carson Hornsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thom Mallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim McGinley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Stolz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 6-0
L
Chris Villani / Sharlles Menezes
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carson Hornsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Jake Henson / Chase White
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hoa Dang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 5-7
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 2-6
W
Matthew Costello / Thery George
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thom Mallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 7-5
L
Michael Smith / Steven Hynes
2025-12-13 · Chimney Springs (Greg Spick)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hoa Dang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 0-6
L
2025-11-15 · Chimney Springs (Greg Spick)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carson Hornsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-17 · Chimney Springs (Emily Simmons)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurel Floyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-26 · Chimney Springs (Emily Simmons)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Christian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 47.2% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.7% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#1 Singles
21%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams