← Search

Jace Taka

Hilo, HI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 16W–32L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jace Taka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-06-28 · Ball Boys · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · Ball Boys · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Simeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Ball Boys · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Simeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · Cookie Monsters · #1 Male Doubles · 7.0 · with TAKAMASA BANDO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · Cookie Monsters · #1 Male Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenn Takase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-17 · Cookie Monsters · #1 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Marissa Hayashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Kala Haasenritter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Kip Nagata championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-0
L
2025-06-14 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-31 · Mid-Court Crisis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Aronce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-25 · The Ball Boys · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-05-18 · The Ball Boys · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caedan Cambra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 45.4% of games
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 44.8% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.8% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 29.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Male Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova