← Search

Suraj Sarvode Mothi

— year-end
42 matches · 31W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Suraj Sarvode Mothi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Johnson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ariel Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Yen/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · Jussely/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · Jussely/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Ronald Zerna Encalada / Chris Garner
2026-04-08 · Jussely/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aman Seth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-28 · Yen/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-21 · Jussely/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Daniel Kim / Zach Bush
2026-03-19 · Jussely/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-24 · Jussely/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-23 · Jussely/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Slaughter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-13 · Jussely/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Stukenborg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-04 · Jussely/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams21 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.8% of games
3.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.6% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#1 Singles
14%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer