← Search

Wally Dawson

— year-end
78 matches · 40W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Wally Dawson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-09-07 · GQuattlebaum/Reishman (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathan Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · PKartes/WDawson (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Gerbereux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-24 · GQuattlebaum/Reishman (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathan Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · PKartes/WDawson (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Kartes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-13 · PKartes/WDawson (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Hamer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · WTiedeman (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jay Tiedeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · WDawson (Olde Providence Racquet Club) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-05 · GQuattlebaum (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Schrimsher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · GQuattlebaum (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gibson Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · WLewis (Veterans) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rusty Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-15 · WLewis (Veterans) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rusty Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · GQuattlebaum (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Schrimsher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
58.7%
27W–19L · 52% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 40% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.9% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova