← Search

Ashutosh Chaudhari

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 61W–63L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ashutosh Chaudhari to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-09-11 · TOC.Horowitz · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sud Ramasamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · TOC.Xiao · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
Amit Kumar / Shivam Panthri
2026-08-28 · TOC.Chaudhari · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with DEEPAK GAONKAR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · TOC.Xiao · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · NMAC.Tandon · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shenba Maruthamuthu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Horowitz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jay Thakkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
W
Zachary Hopp / Conner Garrison
2026-08-22 · TOC.Chaudhari · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Sheppard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · NMAC.Tandon · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Manjit Joshi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · TOC.Horowitz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sud Ramasamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · TOC.Xiao · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · TOC.Xiao · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · TOC.Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Yates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
49.3%
35W–36L · 51.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 22.8% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.8% of games
7.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.9% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#2 Singles
14%
17 matches
#3 Singles
7%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert