← Search

MacI Mills

— year-end
77 matches · 48W–29L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add MacI Mills to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Candace Mason/Calhoun · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Candace Mason/Calhoun · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · Terina Fowler/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Torbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-2
W
Kerrigan LeBoeuf / Denise Smith
2026-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Vess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Denise Smith / Libby Lanier
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · Mason · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-15 · Fowler/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandro Onesto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Mason · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Mason · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Fowler/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaiden Stanley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Mason · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Berkley Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jessica Jordan / Stephanie Cashion
2026-05-25 · Angland/Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crissy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams41 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 68.6% of games
3.5
56%
14W–11L · 53.1% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
68%
17W–8L · 56.2% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 30.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#2 Singles
12%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert