Shelby Fill
68 matches · 42W–26L · seasons 2023–2026
Captains: add Shelby Fill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history68 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
Kim Riley / Catie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 79.6% of games
3.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 57.8% of games
3.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 50.9% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
30%
3W–7L · 42.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.