← Search

Linda Woodard

— year-end
70 matches · 30W–40L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Linda Woodard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-09-02 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Hartzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-24 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kate Grabowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-05 · CTL55/FRAME/WWD · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia McLaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Suneeta Kamana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gail Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · CTL18/Woodard/WWD · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meghan Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · CTL18/Woodard/WWD · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Line Rahman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · CTL18/Woodard/WWD · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Pillaure Cleary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-10 · CTL18/Woodard/WWD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-22 · CTL18/Woodard/WWD · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Pillaure Cleary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
68%
17W–8L · 57% of games
3.0
16.7%
5W–25L · 33.3% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 58% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova