← Search

Jacqueline Wierzba

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 44W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jacqueline Wierzba to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-08-16 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Reisbeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-2
W
Brittney Lacey
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · NJ PINK · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kyle Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · MC TEAL · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Sarah Fitzgerald / Rohini Gupta
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Katie Keighley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Erin Rhodes / Melissa Gateley
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Katie Keighley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Jolein Harro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · MC TEAL · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kailyn Kampert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 64.4% of games
3.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 50.4% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.9% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal