← Search

Megan Dempsey

Lakewood, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 82W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Megan Dempsey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Tamara Rosenbloom championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-15 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · GTC-Ohagan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · GTC-Ohagan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · Rosenbloom/Dempsey - IDMB · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 58% of games
3.5
73.6%
53W–19L · 60.8% of games
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
48 matches
#1 Singles
37%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams