← Search

Melissa Valero

Holly Springs, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 19W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Melissa Valero to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-07-13 · NMAC.Friedman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · NMAC.Friedman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Carley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-06-22 · NMAC.Friedman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Bownes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · NMAC.Friedman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Crone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · NMAC.Crone · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Bownes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · NMAC.Crone · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ines Murman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · NMAC.Crone · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Bownes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-15 · NMAC.Crone · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Bownes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-09 · NMAC.Crone · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Peach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-04 · TING.Friedman · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Claudia Bownes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-09-23 · TING.Friedman · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ines Murman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-09-11 · TING.Friedman · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Danelle Alex
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.1% of games
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#3 Singles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova