← Search

Carol Paull

College Station, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 21W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Carol Paull to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Meyer · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Waco Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eliseo Resendez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
Christopher Thomasson / Nisha Patel
2026-07-28 · Waco Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cody Melcer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
Taylor Gehring / Chelsea Gehring
2026-06-24 · Thomasson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Farnum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Benjamin Burnett / Tammy Bray
2026-06-23 · Waco Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathan Burson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · Thomasson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Farnum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
Benjamin Burnett / Shana Jeter
2026-06-10 · Thomasson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Farnum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Amy Gaston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · Wray · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-28 · Meyer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · Wray · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Aissa Barberena / TANIA SALAZAR
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · with Amy Fields championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 61.3% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert