← Search

Amy Adcox

Brandon, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 47W–69L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amy Adcox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Parr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-02 · Britt, Virginia · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anna Lucovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kayla Saranthus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-17 · Powers, Catherine · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tracy Roan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jamie Mask
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-10 · Powers, Catherine · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Robyn Pressley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Britt, Virginia · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marissa Mucho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Virginia Britt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Holt, Robbie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wade Hawkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · Holt, Robbie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenny Pilgrim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
48.9%
22W–23L · 52% of games
3.0
13.3%
4W–26L · 35.2% of games
5.5
48.6%
18W–19L · 53.9% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer