← Search

Mark Cullip

— year-end
19 matches · 1W–18L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mark Cullip to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-06-14 · CORA Eagles Jones-Stamm · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Parker Wirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · CORA Eagles Jones-Stamm · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chris Nystrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · CORA Eagles Jones-Stamm · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Parker Wirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · CORA Eagles Jones-Stamm · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chris Nystrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · CORA Eagles Jones-Stamm · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-27 · 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5 · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-13 · 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5 · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-06 · 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5 · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-29 · 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5 · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-24 · 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-29 · 2 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-28 · 2 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 3.0 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Elander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 21.5% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#2 Singles
11%
2 matches
#3 Singles
11%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert