← Search

Jaime Tovar

Canoga Park, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 125W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jaime Tovar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Trial and Error/Heum/El Cariso · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Heum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-30 · Full Metal Racquets/Tovar-Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with TJ St Marie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
W
2026-08-21 · LA - Jaime Tovar · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · Full Metal Racquets/Tovar-Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with TJ St Marie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with TJ St Marie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with TJ St Marie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Neil Nguyen / Michael Donahue
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with TJ St Marie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Full Metal Racquets/Tovar-Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hamidreza Badri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · Full Metal Racquets/Tovar-Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with TJ St Marie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · SFV LLW The Rocky Balboas/Heinrich-Yanez/Balboa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Rosett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · LA - Jaime Tovar · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · SFV LLW The Rocky Balboas/Heinrich-Yanez/Balboa · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pei Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.3% of games
3.5
84.4%
38W–7L · 63.1% of games
4.0
80.4%
41W–10L · 62.2% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 56.1% of games
0.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 65.5% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 62.7% of games
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
39 matches
#1 Singles
20%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
15 matches
#2 Singles
8%
12 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer