← Search

Ramses Meijer

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 69W–11L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ramses Meijer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-08-04 · RMeijer (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · AStein (Ballantyne CC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ami Stein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-19 · RMeijer (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Baumgartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · RMeijer (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Baumgartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · AStein (Ballantyne CC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ami Stein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · AStein (Ballantyne CC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ami Stein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · RMeijer (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · AStein (Ballantyne CC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Guth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Kenneth Osborne / Kevin Petersen
2026-06-17 · RMeijer (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · RMeijer (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Baumgartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · RMeijer (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · AStein (Ballantyne CC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ami Stein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
87.5%
42W–6L · 63.3% of games
4.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 57.7% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 53.8% of games
9.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 59% of games
4.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 68.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 80% of the time
#1 Doubles
80%
64 matches
#1 Male Doubles
11%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams