← Search

Jenna Johnson

Brunswick, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 22W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jenna Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
Wendy McClellan / Jennifer Andrews
2026-09-05 · JITC/Jenna Johnson · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Delia Deen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-27 · JITC/Miel Snowball · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Miel Snowball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · JITC/Jenna Johnson · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lynn Cody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · JITC/Jenna Johnson · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Delia Deen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · JITC/Miel Snowball · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carol Denhof
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · JITC/Miel Snowball · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diane Beeching
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Wendy McClellan / Jennifer Andrews
2026-07-12 · JITC/Jenna Johnson · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lynn Cody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · CCGA/Miel Snowball · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miel Snowball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · CCGA/Miel Snowball · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-15 · CCGA/Miel Snowball · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miel Snowball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-03-01 · CCGA/Miel Snowball · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · CCGA/Miel Snowball · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.8% of games
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 58.2% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.8% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.7% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer