← Search

Avery Hanson

Hattiesburg, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 15W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Avery Hanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Gilbert - LCC 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eli Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · Butler 5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nate Oswalt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Roberto Amay / Carlos Flores
2026-08-25 · Butler 5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Henry Van
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Butler 5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tyler Mcclellan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Gilbert - LCC 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eli Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · Butler 5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jonathan King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-06 · Butler 5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Adam Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Holcomb 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Bolton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Holcomb 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Holcomb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Holcomb 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Bolton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · Holcomb 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Holland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Holcomb 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Holland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 50.5% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 33.3% of games
5.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 46.9% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 33.8% of games
3.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#2 Singles
14%
6 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#3 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal