← Search

Christine Pochily

Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 11W–25L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Christine Pochily to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-08-22 · LCTA18/Donohue/MPR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · LCTA18/Donohue/MPR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Cason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Gretchen Looney / Erin Clark
2026-07-13 · LCTA18/Donohue/MPR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Joan McFadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · LCTA18/Nipp/MPR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-16 · LCTA18/Nipp/MPR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-25 · LCTA18/Nipp/MPR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-23 · LCTA18/Nipp/MPR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-09 · LCTA18/Nipp/MPR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-30 · LCTA18/Nipp/MPR · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-19 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-11 · LCTA18/Donohue-Nipp/MPR · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Linda Jacinth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-08-26 · LCTA18/Donohue-Nipp/MPR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Fasanaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 42.8% of games
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.6% of games
5.5
0%
0W–6L · 29.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
15 matches
#1 Singles
31%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches
#3 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams