← Search

Faheem Ershad

State College, PA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 4W–10L · seasons 2023–2024

Captains: add Faheem Ershad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2024-07-21 · Peggy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geoffrey Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-07-07 · Peggy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Gall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-02 · Ming · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ming Tien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Sarah Phillips / Chad Trout
2023-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret ELLIS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-22 · State College - Chuck · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-07-22 · State College - Chuck · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-07-22 · State College - Chuck · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yosef Bodovski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-17 · State College - Chuck · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcos Lissauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-06-11 · State College - Chuck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ricardo Augusto Fiallo Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-26 · State College - Chuck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regi Kusumaatmadja
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-21 · State College - Chuck · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2022-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Simmons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2023–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.8% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer