← Search

Ben Galjour

Tupelo, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 11W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ben Galjour to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Riley · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blake Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Angle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · Whittle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Wahl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Whittle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Reynolds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · Josh Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · Josh Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danny Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-07 · Riley 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Conn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Thomas Young / Jeff Buse
2026-03-17 · Riley 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Josh Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-11 · Riley 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-11-02 · Riley · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-28 · Cagen Garriga · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-15 · Josh Riley · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Josh Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games
3.0
25%
3W–9L · 42.1% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.3% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 42% of games
2.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 34.1% of games
3.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova