← Search

Sarah Gorman

— year-end
59 matches · 30W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sarah Gorman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
Margaret Cotter / Lindsay Brown
2026-09-13 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Stephanie Johnson / Jennifer Park
2026-08-21 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nikki Prescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · KY/LOU/Scharf/Renda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Metten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Katharine Rivers / Lindsay Brown
2026-05-16 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becca Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-10 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-27 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Sencindiver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-16 · KY/LOU/MANGOLD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-11-09 · KY/LOU/MANGOLD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-01 · KY/LOU/MANGOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Metten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.7% of games
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 63% of games
3.5
44%
11W–14L · 48.6% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
17%
10 matches
#2 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer