← Search

Jana Schmidt

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 5W–15L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jana Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2026-07-06 · Maselbas · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · Maselbas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Breuer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-16 · Quogue, Carroll/Rakauskas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · Maselbas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kinsley Dickerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · Maselbas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Halina Pavels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-29 · Maselbas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Sankovitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-25 · Maselbas · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-25 · Maselbas · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2025-07-21 · Quogue, Villano/Ameres · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcelle de Soares
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-07-07 · Quogue, Villano/Ameres · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-06-16 · Quogue, Ameres/Villano · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcelle de Soares
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-27 · Quogue, Ameres/Villano · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Ameres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 42.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
20%
4 matches
#1 Singles
10%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova